The practical differences between film and digital have narrowed to near-nothing. The meaningful differences are in workflow and relationship to the image.
Film imposes cost per frame — you think harder before shooting. This is not nostalgia; it is a different attention structure. Digital imposes no cost, which produces a different (not inferior) relationship: shoot more, select harder.
The choice is not technical but temperamental. Some photographers think better with constraint; others think better with abundance. Neither is wrong.
Related: film-grain-and-noise, the-decisive-moment